Side-by-side comparison

COST vs PG — Side-by-side comparison

PG screens cheaper on EV/FCF, PG has the higher ROIC, COST has grown revenue faster over five years, and COST has the cleaner balance sheet by net debt / EBITDA.

COST

Costco Co.

Price

$1028.24

Market cap

$450.3B

Day %

N/A

PG

Procter & Gamble

Price

$144.44

Market cap

$372.4B

Day %

N/A

Peer Comparison

Target stock against 1 market-cap comparable peer.

Heat map: red worst to green best


COST Target	Costco Co.	$450.3B	56.5x	55.6x	27.8%	10.5%	2.8%	N/A	-1.1x	N/A
PG	Procter & Gamble	$372.4B	22.2x	25.8x	30.6%	3.5%	16.7%	N/A	-0.4x	N/A

COST implied-growth snapshot

Simple static valuation context using owner earnings yield and realized growth.

EV/FCF

55.6x

FCF yield

1.7%

5Y rev CAGR

10.5%

PG implied-growth snapshot

Simple static valuation context using owner earnings yield and realized growth.

EV/FCF

25.8x

FCF yield

3.8%

5Y rev CAGR

3.5%

5Y indexed stock chart

Static Recharts view indexed to 100 from available annual per-share data.

Quality Scorecard

Build-time composite score for COST.

Grade B

/ 100

Quality Scorecard

Build-time composite score for PG.

Grade B

/ 100